Which statement best supports a preteen starting growth hormone injections as part of a plan to address height concerns?

Study for the Pediatrics Assignment Exam. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Prepare thoroughly for your test!

Multiple Choice

Which statement best supports a preteen starting growth hormone injections as part of a plan to address height concerns?

Explanation:
The main idea here is how to support a preteen’s motivation to start a treatment by tying it to a personal goal and presenting the plan in a hopeful, realistic way. The best statement does exactly that: it acknowledges that being taller matters to the child and frames the injections as a tool to help reach that specific goal. This approach supports adherence because it connects the therapy to something meaningful to the patient, while still communicating that the injections are part of a plan rather than a guaranteed outcome. Why this fits best: it validates the child’s concern about height and references the treatment as a means to achieve that goal, which fosters engagement and ownership of the plan. It also maintains a realistic tone about progress without making absolute promises. Why the other statements are less fitting: one option makes an unrealistically strong promise about being taller than all family members, which can create false expectations and later disappointment. Another option emphasizes that the treatment isn’t always effective, which could undermine motivation or reduce willingness to adhere to the regimen. The last option shifts the focus away from the goal of height, suggesting there are more important traits, which may dampen motivation to pursue the treatment. Overall, linking the treatment to the child's own goal in a hopeful but honest way best supports ongoing, collaborative decision-making and adherence.

The main idea here is how to support a preteen’s motivation to start a treatment by tying it to a personal goal and presenting the plan in a hopeful, realistic way. The best statement does exactly that: it acknowledges that being taller matters to the child and frames the injections as a tool to help reach that specific goal. This approach supports adherence because it connects the therapy to something meaningful to the patient, while still communicating that the injections are part of a plan rather than a guaranteed outcome.

Why this fits best: it validates the child’s concern about height and references the treatment as a means to achieve that goal, which fosters engagement and ownership of the plan. It also maintains a realistic tone about progress without making absolute promises.

Why the other statements are less fitting: one option makes an unrealistically strong promise about being taller than all family members, which can create false expectations and later disappointment. Another option emphasizes that the treatment isn’t always effective, which could undermine motivation or reduce willingness to adhere to the regimen. The last option shifts the focus away from the goal of height, suggesting there are more important traits, which may dampen motivation to pursue the treatment.

Overall, linking the treatment to the child's own goal in a hopeful but honest way best supports ongoing, collaborative decision-making and adherence.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy